Breaking The Brand - Stop the Demand

  • Breaking The Brand
    • The Problem
    • Campaigns
    • How To Create a Demand Reduction Campaign
    • How To Evaluate A Demand Reduction Campaign
  • About Us
    • Expert Guidance
    • Contact
  • Take Action
    • Speak Out
    • Donate
  • Media
  • Supporters
  • Blog

June 5, 2014 by lynn

One Person’s ‘Myth’ Is Another Person’s ‘Cultural Belief’

Of the series of adverts created for the pilot campaign one in particular has generated more comment than all the others put together:

Mother and Child

In this advert we use the term “to medicate” and people feel that this may give the use of rhino horn legitimacy. As more campaigns are developed to target the consumers of a range of illegal or endangered wildlife product, we thought people may be interested in the psychology behind creating the advert in the way we have.

We do want to capture the attention of users who do consider rhino horn a medication/supplement; and to get the attention of these users we have been advised not to directly challenge a cultural belief. So if one person’s ‘cultural belief’ is another person’s ‘myth’, namely ‘rhino horn’s link to any medical value’ how do you debunk a myth?

A recent article in The Conversation by John Cook of the University of Queensland summaries this well. When you look at psychological research into misinformation, you don’t have to avoid mentioning the myth altogether. You have to activate it in people’s minds before they can label it as wrong or unhelpful.

Secondly, you need to replace the myth with an alternate narrative. This is usually an explanation of why the myth is wrong or how it came about. We have chosen not to use the right/wrong argument. People have for years said that there is no medical evidence that rhino horn is useful in the treatment of illness and stated that the ‘myth’ is wrong. This argument hasn’t worked to date. To wait for definitive evidence, from medical research conducted in a way that the users of rhino horn would consider it legitimate, stating that there is absolutely no medical evidence that rhino horn is useful in dealing with illness, would take years. The wild rhino population is likely to be long gone before the results of such research being universally accepted.

So we have chosen to run this first advert in parallel with an ad that creates a new story about rhino horn, a new ‘myth’ (with a powerful emotion and a grain of truth) if you like:

Mother and Child Advert Version 2

This is the reason we have taken this approach to use the term “to medicate”  in one of our adverts.

Share this post...Share on Facebook
Facebook
Email this to someone
email
Share on Reddit
Reddit
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

Filed Under: Blog

Recent Blog Posts

The Elephant In The Room

August 17, 2017 By lynn

The Motivation To Contribute Research – Preliminary Results

July 5, 2017 By lynn

Recent Spike In Rhino Poaching

June 16, 2017 By lynn

The Power of One

June 11, 2017 By lynn

Want To Know Why Conservation Is Failing? Read On….

April 16, 2017 By lynn

Subscribe to Our Blog

Quick Links:

>> Home >> Volunteer
>> Donate >> Fundraise

Follow Us On Social Media

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Contact Information

GPO Box 2638, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia

Breaking the Brand is supported by:

Copyright © 2021 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in